Skip to main content

Defense Industry - Part 5 - Numbers don't lie



To get an idea of the level of differences between India and Pakistan (not looking at China on this comparison) please read this.



This comparison is very interesting in that it shows the percentage against the highest in the globe. One will find that in many cases India is lagging far behind China and China is a real and present danger to India.

While most commentators focus on the numbers and make it sound that India is numerically far superior, which is true, the devil lies in the details.

Parameter
India
Pakistan
Difference X
Population in Mil
1339
212
6.3
GDP in Billion $
2900
305
9.5
Defence as percentage of GDP
2.5 %
2.9 %
0.86
Military budget in Bil $
55.9
10.8
5.18
Coastline
7516 Kms
700 kms
10.7
Border length
3323
3323 kms
1
Land mass
3.29 Mil Sq Kms
0.89 Mil Sq Kms
3.69

Now let’s take a dip stick data of the armed forces infrastructure

Parameter
India
Pakistan
Difference X
Military budget in Bil $
56
11
5.09
Active personnel in Mil
2.1
0.65
3.23
Artillery
5067
3745
1.35
Self-propelled artillery
290
325
0.89
Rockets
292
134
2.18
Tanks
4426
2735
1.62
Armoured vehicles
5681
3066
1.85
Total aircraft
2216
1143
1.94
Fighter aircraft
323
186
1.74
Multi role
329
225
1.46
Attack
220
90
2.44
Helicopters
725
323
2.24
Total naval
214
231
0.93
Frigates
15
9
1.67
Submarines
15
5
3
Airborne early warning systems
4
7
0.57
Nuclear weapons
130
130
1

Now while actual figures can vary, the differences and ratios will remain the same. While statistics can lie, they also tell a story. For a country that is between 6 to 10 times bigger than Pakistan on the parameters that need to be defended, the defence infrastructure is hardly 2 times in most cases and slightly higher in some. The point here is not to argue on specific numbers but the fact that India’s defence preparedness in terms of infrastructure is not as high as it should be.  Pakistan whether you like it or not in terms of military hardware is much closer to parity with India and that is discomforting. While we can wax eloquent about the economic differences the fact is that even with 1/5th of the budget in absolute amounts the level of military hardware preparedness of Pakistan is half that of India in a manner of speaking. This tells a very grim story indeed.

When you take into consideration that China is also hostile to India and a close ally of Pakistan, these figures can tell a vastly different story. Defence preparedness is woefully short, and we cannot blame anyone but ourselves for it. India does not have a single bordering country that can come to its aid in times of war whereas Pakistan has China the big brother watching its back. 2019 is not 1971 and today neither USA nor Russia will step in to aid either country. On the other hand, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Nepal, Myanmar have all not exactly been overtly friendly towards India in the past decade and more.

So while India can thump its chest on being bigger and the Pakistan leadership keeps emphasising this difference the reality is that hardware to hardware, head to head military wise, Pakistan in 2019 is no pushover and with a itching finger on the nuclear button India would be making a grave mistake to underestimate Pakistan – jingoism aside.

Just for a minute lets imagine that most of these military hardware statistics showed a difference of 3 to 4x between India and Pakistan – the belligerence of Pakistan today would likely me far more muted than what it is. Just read these latest reports on preparedness of even the basic variety in the most hostile battle zone.


That in 2018 we are talking of exploring options to manufacture winter clothing locally shows the level of lethargy and moribund systems that exist.


That the Indian govts post 1971 and especially post 1988 Bofors have allowed India to grow weak militarily is fact. That ever since the days of Nehru as demonstrated in the 1962 China war Indian govts have not exactly been focussing on defence preparedness is a sorry tale to tell.  All the talk of a cold start, two front war feels good on paper and the Indian armed forces can still prevail but only because of being able to sustain a longer period of engagement in a war. Today fact is that the Indian armed forces from a conventional war point of view are not a deterrence to Pakistan. While the govts have taken some knee jerk decisions in between the fact is also that it is only post 2014 that there has been a concerted effort to build military parity and conventional deterrence.  The last time there was some modicum of seriousness given to matters military was in the months prior to the 1971 war which again was by default and not design. This effort will still take years to yield results provided the momentum is maintained.

We move to the end

https://rvasisht.blogspot.com/2020/02/defense-industry-part-6-in-conclusion.html


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The INDI Alliance has indeed won !!!!

Quite a long time back when I first got the opportunity to sit in a company board meeting, I noticed the Chairman making a strange remark as he opened the board meeting. He used to say something like – “Please unhide your hidden agendas and keep your vested interests outside”. Young, intrigued I finally summoned enough courage to understand this from some other seniors and got a lesson I have never forgotten. He said that be it a person or an organisation, in many a situation, they have a stated intent and a real intent. Meaning that when they approach a situation, they explain what is their intent which would be more popular, acceptable and palatable to the audience but the real intent could well be very different. Most likely the real intent would be self-defeating or unpopular. In this just concluded election for the Lok Sabha we saw this happening in full flow and to my mind the BJP likely missed reading the message. It is not as if I have some inside information but am using log

Narendra Modi - Evolution of a Leader

  This is NOT about Narendra Modi, even though he is the central character. This is about the evolution of a leader particularly in the BJP and in the NDA/ India in general. Post the electoral defeat in 2009 the BJP was rudderless, notwithstanding the presence of LK Advani. He was old, tired, defeated and BJP could not find a pan India leader to lead the party in the Lok Sabha elections of 2014. They had leaders like Gadkari, Rajnath, Jaitley, Sushma, and however popular none could qualify as an all-India election campaign leader. Popular opinion was it would be a hung parliament. The nation was in a mess, and nobody wanted to clean it given that voter expectations were high, trust low. Kejriwal/ Hazare had mortally wounded the Indian political system. BJP at that point needed a fall guy.  Someone to do the hard work, and if they failed to win, take the blame. If they won, there would be many aspirants to stake a claim to be PM. Parties, barring for those family owned, rarely announced

Questions - Answers anyone ?

Life & weight, certainly changes with time. This is both enduring & educative. A picture they say speaks a million words. The allegation is that in the last 10 years only opposition leaders have been arrested by the Modi govt and these are only political vendetta and nothing more. Let’s not argue that point and grant it as true. That does not mean there are no questions that cannot be asked. The problem is nobody has dared to raise these questions and if one raises them, bingo, the allegation is that one is supporting the Modi govt, blinded being a bhakth and unable to see reality etc. The message is – don’t anybody dare ask questions. Only the old eco-system has the wisdom and freedom to ask questions. Those who ask any question that is inconvenient to the old eco-system you become an apologist for the evil, fascist, dictatorial kind of adjectives. But questions must be asked. They will be asked. If folks don’t have the courage to answer and prefer to be belligerent, then so b