Skip to main content

Defense Industry - Part 5 - Numbers don't lie



To get an idea of the level of differences between India and Pakistan (not looking at China on this comparison) please read this.



This comparison is very interesting in that it shows the percentage against the highest in the globe. One will find that in many cases India is lagging far behind China and China is a real and present danger to India.

While most commentators focus on the numbers and make it sound that India is numerically far superior, which is true, the devil lies in the details.

Parameter
India
Pakistan
Difference X
Population in Mil
1339
212
6.3
GDP in Billion $
2900
305
9.5
Defence as percentage of GDP
2.5 %
2.9 %
0.86
Military budget in Bil $
55.9
10.8
5.18
Coastline
7516 Kms
700 kms
10.7
Border length
3323
3323 kms
1
Land mass
3.29 Mil Sq Kms
0.89 Mil Sq Kms
3.69

Now let’s take a dip stick data of the armed forces infrastructure

Parameter
India
Pakistan
Difference X
Military budget in Bil $
56
11
5.09
Active personnel in Mil
2.1
0.65
3.23
Artillery
5067
3745
1.35
Self-propelled artillery
290
325
0.89
Rockets
292
134
2.18
Tanks
4426
2735
1.62
Armoured vehicles
5681
3066
1.85
Total aircraft
2216
1143
1.94
Fighter aircraft
323
186
1.74
Multi role
329
225
1.46
Attack
220
90
2.44
Helicopters
725
323
2.24
Total naval
214
231
0.93
Frigates
15
9
1.67
Submarines
15
5
3
Airborne early warning systems
4
7
0.57
Nuclear weapons
130
130
1

Now while actual figures can vary, the differences and ratios will remain the same. While statistics can lie, they also tell a story. For a country that is between 6 to 10 times bigger than Pakistan on the parameters that need to be defended, the defence infrastructure is hardly 2 times in most cases and slightly higher in some. The point here is not to argue on specific numbers but the fact that India’s defence preparedness in terms of infrastructure is not as high as it should be.  Pakistan whether you like it or not in terms of military hardware is much closer to parity with India and that is discomforting. While we can wax eloquent about the economic differences the fact is that even with 1/5th of the budget in absolute amounts the level of military hardware preparedness of Pakistan is half that of India in a manner of speaking. This tells a very grim story indeed.

When you take into consideration that China is also hostile to India and a close ally of Pakistan, these figures can tell a vastly different story. Defence preparedness is woefully short, and we cannot blame anyone but ourselves for it. India does not have a single bordering country that can come to its aid in times of war whereas Pakistan has China the big brother watching its back. 2019 is not 1971 and today neither USA nor Russia will step in to aid either country. On the other hand, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Nepal, Myanmar have all not exactly been overtly friendly towards India in the past decade and more.

So while India can thump its chest on being bigger and the Pakistan leadership keeps emphasising this difference the reality is that hardware to hardware, head to head military wise, Pakistan in 2019 is no pushover and with a itching finger on the nuclear button India would be making a grave mistake to underestimate Pakistan – jingoism aside.

Just for a minute lets imagine that most of these military hardware statistics showed a difference of 3 to 4x between India and Pakistan – the belligerence of Pakistan today would likely me far more muted than what it is. Just read these latest reports on preparedness of even the basic variety in the most hostile battle zone.


That in 2018 we are talking of exploring options to manufacture winter clothing locally shows the level of lethargy and moribund systems that exist.


That the Indian govts post 1971 and especially post 1988 Bofors have allowed India to grow weak militarily is fact. That ever since the days of Nehru as demonstrated in the 1962 China war Indian govts have not exactly been focussing on defence preparedness is a sorry tale to tell.  All the talk of a cold start, two front war feels good on paper and the Indian armed forces can still prevail but only because of being able to sustain a longer period of engagement in a war. Today fact is that the Indian armed forces from a conventional war point of view are not a deterrence to Pakistan. While the govts have taken some knee jerk decisions in between the fact is also that it is only post 2014 that there has been a concerted effort to build military parity and conventional deterrence.  The last time there was some modicum of seriousness given to matters military was in the months prior to the 1971 war which again was by default and not design. This effort will still take years to yield results provided the momentum is maintained.

We move to the end

https://rvasisht.blogspot.com/2020/02/defense-industry-part-6-in-conclusion.html


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Letter I received from AAP and My response....

This is the email I got and my response is below. Of course AAP has neither acknowledged my mail nor do I expect them to since you see they are god, perfection rolled into one. From:  Aam Aadmi Party To:  Ravindra Vasisht <................>  Sent:  Wednesday, 2 April 2014 9:53 PM Subject:  Why did Arvind Kejriwal resign? Dear Ravindra Vasisht As an Aam Aadmi Party supporter, you must have been asked a hundred times, why Arvind Kejriwal resigned as the Delhi Chief Minister? Well, here is the answer. AAP got  only 28 of 70 seats  in the Delhi Assembly election. Still, the Lt Governor invited Arvind to form the government, as the Congress (with 8 seats) had offered unconditional support. Finding it hard to believe, Arvind sent a letter to the Congress President listing out the 18 points in the AAP manifesto, including passing of the Jan Lokpal bill. The Congress reverted saying it will support AAP unconditionally ...

The Iranian Conundrum

The middle east is a conundrum of gigantic proportions ridden by conflict, contradiction and wealth. Historically the crusades, a war between Christians and Muslims, was to gain control over the epicentre, Jerusalem as the target. That war ended in 1291, but much later Britain and France took control over much of Middle east till after World War 2. Most nations in the middle east gained independence post 1930’s. 1930s-1940s: Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel 1950s: Libya, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia Post 1960s: Kuwait, South Yemen, UAE While WW2 pushed Britain and France to cede control, my surmise is the western nations understood the importance of the oil wealth in that area, and continued to exert influence. The predominantly Christian post WW2 west leveraged the inherent contradictions within the Muslim ideology.  In the middle east, Saudi Arabia followed by Iran are the largest in terms of size, making them tougher to control. Post WW2, the western nations gained ...

Random Musings - November 2025

Women in Blue:   If Kapil’s devils in 1983 created history to win the Men’s cricket world cup, the Harmanpreet’s angels did so in 2025 winning the Women’s cricket world cup. Watching the match was a treat and a welcome change. The sheer energy the girls had was palpably visible. When a bowler started her run up, seeing the girls especially at covers, mid off and point crouch like tigers ready to spring was sheer poetry. They reminded me of Pataudi and Brijesh Patel. The fielding of the team was excellent. Some of the girls when batting really hit powerful sixes and the sheer confidence they exuded by just standing and watching the ball cross the fence was sublime. What was really heart warming was the crowd turnout as the match finished only around midnight. The DY Patil stadium with a capacity of over 45,000 was packed to the gills and the support our women in blue got was unbelievable. I don’t think the girls expected a full house crowd cheering them and this response should mo...