Skip to main content

Random Musings July 2017



It’s one of those days when a few random tweets or blogs create a unifying thread within you to share some thoughts on a variety of issues but again bound by a common thread – the future of India & our children.

I was motivated by the following blogs early in the morning on a Monday.






Now one may wonder what is the common thread between these blogs. It is the realisation of the truth that the citizens of India are waking up, that social media inspite of all its viciousness and negativity is catalysing citizens to look inwards into themselves, into a mirror and finally that a political & privileged class can no longer think that they decide the destiny of the country.

These maybe early days yet, the stirrings of a new born but, yet, a new promise, a new future that hopefully will make this world a better place for our future generations.

As the last blog bluntly shows the mirror to us saying that – stop whining at the politicians, start seeing for what we are as citizens. If we as citizens don’t bother about our country, our society there is no point in blaming politicians and their network.

In modern management parlance, I saw this poster at a top Indian multinational engineering group – “The speed of an organisation is determined by the speed of its leader”.

Funny isn’t it, that every one of us wax eloquent about the leadership of Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Jack Welch, JRD Tata, Narayan Murthy, Rockfeller, Larry Page, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk and the hundreds of others in the business field where they led from the front.  Their organisations were identified by them, they left a strong imprint of themselves on the organisations, they created a vision and followed it up to success and for all their personal behaviour but, did not exactly run their organisations like a secular liberal democracy. They preferred merit over all else, they demanded discipline & team work from their team and while they listened to diverse opinions, finally decided what they felt was the best decision. Fortunately, nobody arranges voting to decide how many within their organisations agreed with their decisions. The markets and customers decide that. But when it comes to politics and running a country, we start complaining about strong leaders, about democracy and so on forgetting that there is we are still the market, the customers and there is something called elections in which we can participate, vote – but even that we are loath to do.

See also how we the same citizens blindly accepted the leadership of Gandhi, Nehru, Indira, Churchill, Roosevelt etc who were by no means the most democratic or their decisions judged by how many actually voted for them. Lincoln won the election with less than 40% of the votes and another time by 55%. Lincoln braving all odds ensured that slavery was abolished inspite of the fact that many supported it then. Nobody questioned Lincoln, Nehru with the intensity that a leader is today questioned while a Gandhi refused to lead the country and never fought any elections as I ask in my blog.


Nobody questions the iron fisted hold Nehru and later Indira had over the party and the nation and the vision they decided to establish for India – socialistic democracy with a blend of monarchy. He won by just 45% votes in the first Lok Sabha elections, yet was widely accepted by the nation. Even Indira after the emergency in 1975 obtained 35% votes and the Janata Party won with just 43%. Can we conclude that 35% or maybe 57% of the nation supported the emergency and its horrors ?

Nehru and Indira did many crucial mistakes for which the nation even today suffers. Yet we eulogise them for their contribution to nation building. Today, many of us  citizens live in a utopian dream world where we think that only someone with 100% votes is eligible to have the moral right to take decisions and create a vision. We cannot be more wrong.

In the old days when Kings ruled and Monarchy prevailed the popular saying was – “Yatha Raja Thatha Praja” – As the king, so the citizens.  Today the same thing should read as – “Yatha Praja Thatha Raja” – As the citizens, so the leaders.

Politics and society has changed over the last few years. The naĂ¯ve will want to see this as a post 2014 phenomenon. Truth is that it changed post 2000, slowly but surely. Only thing, we citizens were not aware of it in real time unlike now due to SM. We did not have a voice earlier unlike now. I wrote this in 2014.

Globally citizens are sick of the conventional politician and cynical. When Trump was campaigning, the negative press and news about him was so wide spread that only an idiot would have assumed he could win. Similarly, nobody in their right sense of mind would even think that before the 2014 elections Modi would be nominated for the post, let alone become PM. Yet both won. If you are a true believer in democracy – accept it – even if you disagree with them – on some issues. Blind hate and opposition to every decision will not help democracy or the nation – it will only produce more leaders who have no stake in anything except their own enrichment. We citizens will suffer because they then know we citizens have no stake in the nation and they will play to the gallery of those who will vote for them. That’s dangerous.

So, it’s time to stop cribbing and start getting involved in the nation. We can disagree with plans, programs and leaders – irrespective of what and who they are. But let us not abrogate the right to be involved. Let us not forget that no nation can move forward with a unipolar view of society, even if they think they live in a unipolar society. The world is globalised and whether we like it or not we have to interact with each other, deal with each other, depend on each other as a human race. Also, even within the so called unipolar society it is not that harmony is achieved. Human beings will find other ways to find a difference, a diversity within themselves and still fight, oppose each other.

Each of the blogs linked above teach us about accepting diversity, accepting mistakes, understanding the fault lines in the society and most importantly – getting involved as citizens – beyond voting – but into nation building and being the change we demand from others.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Iranian Conundrum

The middle east is a conundrum of gigantic proportions ridden by conflict, contradiction and wealth. Historically the crusades, a war between Christians and Muslims, was to gain control over the epicentre, Jerusalem as the target. That war ended in 1291, but much later Britain and France took control over much of Middle east till after World War 2. Most nations in the middle east gained independence post 1930’s. 1930s-1940s: Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel 1950s: Libya, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia Post 1960s: Kuwait, South Yemen, UAE While WW2 pushed Britain and France to cede control, my surmise is the western nations understood the importance of the oil wealth in that area, and continued to exert influence. The predominantly Christian post WW2 west leveraged the inherent contradictions within the Muslim ideology.  In the middle east, Saudi Arabia followed by Iran are the largest in terms of size, making them tougher to control. Post WW2, the western nations gained ...

Random Musings - November 2025

Women in Blue:   If Kapil’s devils in 1983 created history to win the Men’s cricket world cup, the Harmanpreet’s angels did so in 2025 winning the Women’s cricket world cup. Watching the match was a treat and a welcome change. The sheer energy the girls had was palpably visible. When a bowler started her run up, seeing the girls especially at covers, mid off and point crouch like tigers ready to spring was sheer poetry. They reminded me of Pataudi and Brijesh Patel. The fielding of the team was excellent. Some of the girls when batting really hit powerful sixes and the sheer confidence they exuded by just standing and watching the ball cross the fence was sublime. What was really heart warming was the crowd turnout as the match finished only around midnight. The DY Patil stadium with a capacity of over 45,000 was packed to the gills and the support our women in blue got was unbelievable. I don’t think the girls expected a full house crowd cheering them and this response should mo...

Letter I received from AAP and My response....

This is the email I got and my response is below. Of course AAP has neither acknowledged my mail nor do I expect them to since you see they are god, perfection rolled into one. From:  Aam Aadmi Party To:  Ravindra Vasisht <................>  Sent:  Wednesday, 2 April 2014 9:53 PM Subject:  Why did Arvind Kejriwal resign? Dear Ravindra Vasisht As an Aam Aadmi Party supporter, you must have been asked a hundred times, why Arvind Kejriwal resigned as the Delhi Chief Minister? Well, here is the answer. AAP got  only 28 of 70 seats  in the Delhi Assembly election. Still, the Lt Governor invited Arvind to form the government, as the Congress (with 8 seats) had offered unconditional support. Finding it hard to believe, Arvind sent a letter to the Congress President listing out the 18 points in the AAP manifesto, including passing of the Jan Lokpal bill. The Congress reverted saying it will support AAP unconditionally ...