Skip to main content

Political Polarisation



Somehow I have been a close follower of politics since the emergency days and subsequently my job gave me an opportunity to interact with many a politician and that only increased my understanding and  appreciation of the challenges.  After the historic elections in 1977 when the country got its first non Congress India has never seen a election that  was emotionally surcharged with strong  and  different political opinions till this impending election of 2014.  While many would like to point out that a Modi is a polarising figure the reality is that each of the major players in the elections – Modi/BJP, Rahul/Congress & Arvind/AAP are equally polarising in their own ways. Each of their supporters have very strong emotionally connected views and life to each is black/ white. No more the shade of grey that one thinks life is all about.

When you think of any election, especially this one the fact is that barring for that one brief moment when you press the voting button and make a decision the rest of the time it is all about differing opinions, issues and debate. The black/white moment is gone when you pressed the button and life is back to being grey.

Irrespective of who wins can you then say that the  winner represents, protects and works for only those who voted for them ?  No. The reality is that whoever wins automatically becomes responsible for carrying and protecting the interests of the entire 1.2 billion people of India. If there is a crisis like a war or something similar can you say that only those who voted for the ruling party will support them and the rest will oppose them ? The answer again is No.

This is where I find the extreme reactions amongst the people rather disturbing because it robs us of the fundamental identity of being one nation one people called India and Indians. One renowned author even went to the extent of saying that he would leave India if a Modi were elected.  While he said it openly I find a similar mindset amongst many I speak to which is dangerous.  Let us say for example that Modi is the PM and say terrorists attack India, will such people immediately support and help the terrorists ?  Alternately  if say a Arvind becomes the PM and a similar situation is there will those who don’t like him rejoice at  terror attacks or maybe even facilitate it ?  I would like the answer to be no but some reactions from many people make me wonder.....

It is next to impossible to get concurrence even within a family on many issues so trying to get concurrence from 1.2 billion people of India is a myth. So at the end of the day my opinion is that barring for that split second when you press the voting button, at all other times every party, every individual who plans to lead the country/state belongs to  all of us.  No one party or leader is the embodiment of all that each of us desire but each has positive and negative points and as Indians I think it is high time that we look at the positives and strengths in each party/leader and focus on that. By all means let us debate and discuss various issues and we can agree on some disagree on some.  That is what I try to do everytime and I find myself at odds with many because I cannot have balanced views across parties/leaders.

If I support AAP or Congress then I must say that Gujarat is the worst possible state, with no governance, no development and the government is full of crooks. If I support  BJP then the others are literally selling the country off.  There is no question of a person supporting/appreciating the positives in each while opposing/criticising the negatives based on our opinion. Our behaviour is as we are voting every minute of the day to support our preference and criticise the others.


However I continue to believe that each party and leader has his/her own SWOT and opinions and I can well agree/disagree with them but none is a pariah for me none that I hate  and if that makes me different, then so be it.   I will in a follow up share my views on the parties/leaders and my own dream cabinet. After all whatever be the age fantasies don’t go away, they only change.

Comments

Unknown said…
Good article! I would like to add the following:
1. Hypothetically, if BJP had put up a Sushma Swaraj or an Arun Jaitley as it's face, someone who's perceived to be a moderate personality than someone who's perceived to be polarizing, there would be less negative stuff spoken about by the supporters of other parties. In fact, anti incumbency was anyway overwhelmingly in favor of the NDA/BJP... Modi coming in is a big risk... and like most big risks, it may be rewarding as well... But the daily explosion of news/rumors on social media by some fierce critics & some fanatics + the emergence of AAPs what made things tougher for the BJP.
2. No hardcore, reasonably knowledged supporter of a non-BJP party says that Gujarat has no accolades at all. That's a wrong perception. Only idiots would believe no good work has happened in Gujarat. But at the same time, an oversold, exaggerated & at times dishonest marketing stories may also put off many people and hence such reactions to perceptions.
In the end, like you say, we are all Indians and in one way or the other, we are all wishing for the best governance to take India forward.
Cheers!
Vasisht said…
Politics is the art of making the impossible possible. So also these are conjectures on the ifs and buts of life of what would have happened in different circumstances. My personal judgement is that if let us say that MMS had given a modicum of leadership with some presence and stature and assuming that all scams etc did happen then the anti incumbency would have helped BJP, yes, but it would have helped even with a leader like LKA/SS etc. However the absolutely pathetic leadership skills of MMS, with zero presence, reduced to a buffoon by his own partymen made the situation such that the LKA/SS also look weak, pathetic and no spirit. If Modi has 50% skills, the other 50% has come from the perceived ineptness of LKA/SS and the disgrace that MMS has been.

If one were to use a hindi filmi dialogue, with MMS it had become a case of "izzat ki baat". The ONLY metaphor I can give of MMS (and yes I am being very very harsh) is like in a hindi film there is the elderly, invalid father in front of who his young widowed daughter gets raped by goondas while he helplessely watches bleating like a lamb.

Talking of ifs and buts, if AAP had not been in the fray then BJP would have swept to power easily even without Modi.

Also as you rightly say, every high risk game has high rewards too but only time will tell if the rewards exceed the risks or the other way.

Todays world out there is tough and unforgiving, the nation is young, restless and impatient and unfortunately be it LKA/SS/AJ or any of the so called moderate faces would not have found acceptance with the masses or caught their imagination. That is the reason why Kejriwal is also having such a huge fan following since good bad or ugly he is throwing punches, spitting at the high and mighty even if he had no evidence. He is perceived as a "Mard jisme dumm hain. His challenge is to challenise that support. So whether it is Modi or Kejri their appeal is due to the guts and dada giri that they demonstrate.

Popular posts from this blog

Humour in Real Life Part 1

Life has been good to me, have spent significant time travelling, faced various situations and when one looks back, many were rather funny but usually in hindsight. These can lose their sting when written, but I still try. They are not in any order. Gujarat Hotel: Joined a new company and many of us at a senior level were new to the company and each other. Met up in our hotel room on the eve of a meeting in Gujarat – a dry state. Invariably the conversation came to getting alcohol and none knew what to do. One guy had a bright idea and picking up the phone ordered in a friendly but all-knowing voice – Ask Pinto to send it to the room. Obviously, there was some confusion at the other end, but my colleague confidently said – don’t worry yaar, Pinto knows everything, just tell him. Line disconnected and we ask – who’s this Pinto? He says – I don’t know but usually every hotel will have a guy named Pinto !!!!!!. Now Gujarat can have lakhs of Patel’s but not Pinto, a very Goan name bu...

The Iranian Conundrum

The middle east is a conundrum of gigantic proportions ridden by conflict, contradiction and wealth. Historically the crusades, a war between Christians and Muslims, was to gain control over the epicentre, Jerusalem as the target. That war ended in 1291, but much later Britain and France took control over much of Middle east till after World War 2. Most nations in the middle east gained independence post 1930’s. 1930s-1940s: Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel 1950s: Libya, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia Post 1960s: Kuwait, South Yemen, UAE While WW2 pushed Britain and France to cede control, my surmise is the western nations understood the importance of the oil wealth in that area, and continued to exert influence. The predominantly Christian post WW2 west leveraged the inherent contradictions within the Muslim ideology.  In the middle east, Saudi Arabia followed by Iran are the largest in terms of size, making them tougher to control. Post WW2, the western nations gained ...

Random Musings - November 2025

Women in Blue:   If Kapil’s devils in 1983 created history to win the Men’s cricket world cup, the Harmanpreet’s angels did so in 2025 winning the Women’s cricket world cup. Watching the match was a treat and a welcome change. The sheer energy the girls had was palpably visible. When a bowler started her run up, seeing the girls especially at covers, mid off and point crouch like tigers ready to spring was sheer poetry. They reminded me of Pataudi and Brijesh Patel. The fielding of the team was excellent. Some of the girls when batting really hit powerful sixes and the sheer confidence they exuded by just standing and watching the ball cross the fence was sublime. What was really heart warming was the crowd turnout as the match finished only around midnight. The DY Patil stadium with a capacity of over 45,000 was packed to the gills and the support our women in blue got was unbelievable. I don’t think the girls expected a full house crowd cheering them and this response should mo...