Skip to main content

Political Polarisation



Somehow I have been a close follower of politics since the emergency days and subsequently my job gave me an opportunity to interact with many a politician and that only increased my understanding and  appreciation of the challenges.  After the historic elections in 1977 when the country got its first non Congress India has never seen a election that  was emotionally surcharged with strong  and  different political opinions till this impending election of 2014.  While many would like to point out that a Modi is a polarising figure the reality is that each of the major players in the elections – Modi/BJP, Rahul/Congress & Arvind/AAP are equally polarising in their own ways. Each of their supporters have very strong emotionally connected views and life to each is black/ white. No more the shade of grey that one thinks life is all about.

When you think of any election, especially this one the fact is that barring for that one brief moment when you press the voting button and make a decision the rest of the time it is all about differing opinions, issues and debate. The black/white moment is gone when you pressed the button and life is back to being grey.

Irrespective of who wins can you then say that the  winner represents, protects and works for only those who voted for them ?  No. The reality is that whoever wins automatically becomes responsible for carrying and protecting the interests of the entire 1.2 billion people of India. If there is a crisis like a war or something similar can you say that only those who voted for the ruling party will support them and the rest will oppose them ? The answer again is No.

This is where I find the extreme reactions amongst the people rather disturbing because it robs us of the fundamental identity of being one nation one people called India and Indians. One renowned author even went to the extent of saying that he would leave India if a Modi were elected.  While he said it openly I find a similar mindset amongst many I speak to which is dangerous.  Let us say for example that Modi is the PM and say terrorists attack India, will such people immediately support and help the terrorists ?  Alternately  if say a Arvind becomes the PM and a similar situation is there will those who don’t like him rejoice at  terror attacks or maybe even facilitate it ?  I would like the answer to be no but some reactions from many people make me wonder.....

It is next to impossible to get concurrence even within a family on many issues so trying to get concurrence from 1.2 billion people of India is a myth. So at the end of the day my opinion is that barring for that split second when you press the voting button, at all other times every party, every individual who plans to lead the country/state belongs to  all of us.  No one party or leader is the embodiment of all that each of us desire but each has positive and negative points and as Indians I think it is high time that we look at the positives and strengths in each party/leader and focus on that. By all means let us debate and discuss various issues and we can agree on some disagree on some.  That is what I try to do everytime and I find myself at odds with many because I cannot have balanced views across parties/leaders.

If I support AAP or Congress then I must say that Gujarat is the worst possible state, with no governance, no development and the government is full of crooks. If I support  BJP then the others are literally selling the country off.  There is no question of a person supporting/appreciating the positives in each while opposing/criticising the negatives based on our opinion. Our behaviour is as we are voting every minute of the day to support our preference and criticise the others.


However I continue to believe that each party and leader has his/her own SWOT and opinions and I can well agree/disagree with them but none is a pariah for me none that I hate  and if that makes me different, then so be it.   I will in a follow up share my views on the parties/leaders and my own dream cabinet. After all whatever be the age fantasies don’t go away, they only change.

Comments

Unknown said…
Good article! I would like to add the following:
1. Hypothetically, if BJP had put up a Sushma Swaraj or an Arun Jaitley as it's face, someone who's perceived to be a moderate personality than someone who's perceived to be polarizing, there would be less negative stuff spoken about by the supporters of other parties. In fact, anti incumbency was anyway overwhelmingly in favor of the NDA/BJP... Modi coming in is a big risk... and like most big risks, it may be rewarding as well... But the daily explosion of news/rumors on social media by some fierce critics & some fanatics + the emergence of AAPs what made things tougher for the BJP.
2. No hardcore, reasonably knowledged supporter of a non-BJP party says that Gujarat has no accolades at all. That's a wrong perception. Only idiots would believe no good work has happened in Gujarat. But at the same time, an oversold, exaggerated & at times dishonest marketing stories may also put off many people and hence such reactions to perceptions.
In the end, like you say, we are all Indians and in one way or the other, we are all wishing for the best governance to take India forward.
Cheers!
Vasisht said…
Politics is the art of making the impossible possible. So also these are conjectures on the ifs and buts of life of what would have happened in different circumstances. My personal judgement is that if let us say that MMS had given a modicum of leadership with some presence and stature and assuming that all scams etc did happen then the anti incumbency would have helped BJP, yes, but it would have helped even with a leader like LKA/SS etc. However the absolutely pathetic leadership skills of MMS, with zero presence, reduced to a buffoon by his own partymen made the situation such that the LKA/SS also look weak, pathetic and no spirit. If Modi has 50% skills, the other 50% has come from the perceived ineptness of LKA/SS and the disgrace that MMS has been.

If one were to use a hindi filmi dialogue, with MMS it had become a case of "izzat ki baat". The ONLY metaphor I can give of MMS (and yes I am being very very harsh) is like in a hindi film there is the elderly, invalid father in front of who his young widowed daughter gets raped by goondas while he helplessely watches bleating like a lamb.

Talking of ifs and buts, if AAP had not been in the fray then BJP would have swept to power easily even without Modi.

Also as you rightly say, every high risk game has high rewards too but only time will tell if the rewards exceed the risks or the other way.

Todays world out there is tough and unforgiving, the nation is young, restless and impatient and unfortunately be it LKA/SS/AJ or any of the so called moderate faces would not have found acceptance with the masses or caught their imagination. That is the reason why Kejriwal is also having such a huge fan following since good bad or ugly he is throwing punches, spitting at the high and mighty even if he had no evidence. He is perceived as a "Mard jisme dumm hain. His challenge is to challenise that support. So whether it is Modi or Kejri their appeal is due to the guts and dada giri that they demonstrate.

Popular posts from this blog

The INDI Alliance has indeed won !!!!

Quite a long time back when I first got the opportunity to sit in a company board meeting, I noticed the Chairman making a strange remark as he opened the board meeting. He used to say something like – “Please unhide your hidden agendas and keep your vested interests outside”. Young, intrigued I finally summoned enough courage to understand this from some other seniors and got a lesson I have never forgotten. He said that be it a person or an organisation, in many a situation, they have a stated intent and a real intent. Meaning that when they approach a situation, they explain what is their intent which would be more popular, acceptable and palatable to the audience but the real intent could well be very different. Most likely the real intent would be self-defeating or unpopular. In this just concluded election for the Lok Sabha we saw this happening in full flow and to my mind the BJP likely missed reading the message. It is not as if I have some inside information but am using log...

Narendra Modi - Evolution of a Leader

  This is NOT about Narendra Modi, even though he is the central character. This is about the evolution of a leader particularly in the BJP and in the NDA/ India in general. Post the electoral defeat in 2009 the BJP was rudderless, notwithstanding the presence of LK Advani. He was old, tired, defeated and BJP could not find a pan India leader to lead the party in the Lok Sabha elections of 2014. They had leaders like Gadkari, Rajnath, Jaitley, Sushma, and however popular none could qualify as an all-India election campaign leader. Popular opinion was it would be a hung parliament. The nation was in a mess, and nobody wanted to clean it given that voter expectations were high, trust low. Kejriwal/ Hazare had mortally wounded the Indian political system. BJP at that point needed a fall guy.  Someone to do the hard work, and if they failed to win, take the blame. If they won, there would be many aspirants to stake a claim to be PM. Parties, barring for those family owned, rarely ...

Questions - Answers anyone ?

Life & weight, certainly changes with time. This is both enduring & educative. A picture they say speaks a million words. The allegation is that in the last 10 years only opposition leaders have been arrested by the Modi govt and these are only political vendetta and nothing more. Let’s not argue that point and grant it as true. That does not mean there are no questions that cannot be asked. The problem is nobody has dared to raise these questions and if one raises them, bingo, the allegation is that one is supporting the Modi govt, blinded being a bhakth and unable to see reality etc. The message is – don’t anybody dare ask questions. Only the old eco-system has the wisdom and freedom to ask questions. Those who ask any question that is inconvenient to the old eco-system you become an apologist for the evil, fascist, dictatorial kind of adjectives. But questions must be asked. They will be asked. If folks don’t have the courage to answer and prefer to be belligerent, then so b...