Skip to main content

Why we are where we are Part 1


The Economic Times on 28th August 2013 ran a editorial where it asked a question on why we are where we are. This is my response to that editorial as invited by  ET. Part 2 is my further thoughts on the issue and will follow.

Mistakes occur either due to insufficient information,  risk taking,  bad judgement or  due to extraneous reasons beyond our control. Except in the last case every government has the option of making midcourse corrections.  This is exactly where this government has failed miserably  due to arrogance and blind ego apart from lacking in statesmanship. Let us list some correctable goof ups.

UPA was a coalition govt and it was crucial to have a single driver lead it no matter who the driver reported  to. Instead by having a dual power centre between Sonia and Manmohan disaster was guaranteed from day 1. Manmohan was a brilliant economist & bureaucrat but a cipher as a politician. A lamb living amidst lions for decades does not become a lion. Consequently the Congressmen chose to listen to Sonia while the coalition partners went to Pawar, Karunanidhi, Mamta. The result was that there was zero cohesion in decision making, policy framing or even problem solving. The PMO was just a waste bin where the problems landed up finally with no solution possible. For this or whatever reason Manmohan Singh went quiet and stays silent till today.  A large number of scams and issues have their  genesis in this lack of control & direction and once the chains had been removed it has been impossible to bring them back on.

Technology, Global events & Human behaviour  can never be predicted and so events happen that need changes in laws, justice & administration systems &  future strategies. These changes invariably happen AFTER the event. The changes based on learning’s  are a ongoing exercise and  there is no shame in this change.  Global mergers/acquisitions, Ecommerce, Social media,  Arab spring, Sri Lankan war and many such events posed challenges to our existing systems. Instead of responding maturely this govt chose to confront them as if they were a blasphemy. Case in point the Vodafone case where the event was perfectly legal and even the SC ruled against the Govt.  Instead of finding a out of the box, mediated solution  with Vodafone & bringing in fresh legislation the govt instead brought in retrospective change from 1960. This one action did more to damage India’s credibility as a nation more than anything else.

Foreign policy historically has always been sacred and the domain of the central govt which was expected to be above narrow  considerations. Instead we had the mortification of a PM being prevented from  signing  an accord with Bangladesh (which had helped combat terrorism against India), opposing Sri Lanka internationally and in each case a regional  party with a few MP’s decided foreign policy. Consequently the image of India as a banana republic with no driver or leader got reinforced globally and investors became wary of India. While many in public will make the right noises this  writer on his visits globally has found that the reputation of India has nosedived notwithstanding its huge market.

Administrative practices haven’t changed over the years inspite of the economy having changed beyond imagination. The centres of power for decision making remain as it were way back in the 90’s. Consequently a  Jt Secy who handled million dollar decisions now handles billion dollar decisions and the million dollar decisions don’t get focussed attention. It’s natural for any human/ system  to chase the big fish but in the process the dozens of small fish get neglected and  this bad news spreads and affects investment.

The NDA  govt had introduced  market based pricing for fuel,  done the dirty work and lost the election.  This govt changed that policy and the consequent impact due to steeply increasing fuel prices affected the country badly.  This govt is now going back to the old sensible decision of 2004 but 10 years late and after severe haemorrhaging.

Every decision taken has been with good intention, bad planning and poor execution. Consequently whether it is FDI in retail, Insurance reforms or any other policy including the FSB,  decisions have been forced as a fait accompli inspite of their good intent by failing to engage  maturely  with the stakeholders in discussion. The internal lack of leadership & direction has been blamed on the opposition who as is their nature see no reason to bail a govt that is tying itself in knots.

Each of these and  many others were easily correctable problems but for reasons best known to govt they never made an effort to even accept them as problems. Therein lies the rub in our disaster today.

The Concluding Part of this blog 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Humour in Real Life Part 1

Life has been good to me, have spent significant time travelling, faced various situations and when one looks back, many were rather funny but usually in hindsight. These can lose their sting when written, but I still try. They are not in any order. Gujarat Hotel: Joined a new company and many of us at a senior level were new to the company and each other. Met up in our hotel room on the eve of a meeting in Gujarat – a dry state. Invariably the conversation came to getting alcohol and none knew what to do. One guy had a bright idea and picking up the phone ordered in a friendly but all-knowing voice – Ask Pinto to send it to the room. Obviously, there was some confusion at the other end, but my colleague confidently said – don’t worry yaar, Pinto knows everything, just tell him. Line disconnected and we ask – who’s this Pinto? He says – I don’t know but usually every hotel will have a guy named Pinto !!!!!!. Now Gujarat can have lakhs of Patel’s but not Pinto, a very Goan name bu...
2 comments
Read more

The Iranian Conundrum

The middle east is a conundrum of gigantic proportions ridden by conflict, contradiction and wealth. Historically the crusades, a war between Christians and Muslims, was to gain control over the epicentre, Jerusalem as the target. That war ended in 1291, but much later Britain and France took control over much of Middle east till after World War 2. Most nations in the middle east gained independence post 1930’s. 1930s-1940s: Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel 1950s: Libya, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia Post 1960s: Kuwait, South Yemen, UAE While WW2 pushed Britain and France to cede control, my surmise is the western nations understood the importance of the oil wealth in that area, and continued to exert influence. The predominantly Christian post WW2 west leveraged the inherent contradictions within the Muslim ideology.  In the middle east, Saudi Arabia followed by Iran are the largest in terms of size, making them tougher to control. Post WW2, the western nations gained ...
2 comments
Read more

Random Musings - November 2025

Women in Blue:   If Kapil’s devils in 1983 created history to win the Men’s cricket world cup, the Harmanpreet’s angels did so in 2025 winning the Women’s cricket world cup. Watching the match was a treat and a welcome change. The sheer energy the girls had was palpably visible. When a bowler started her run up, seeing the girls especially at covers, mid off and point crouch like tigers ready to spring was sheer poetry. They reminded me of Pataudi and Brijesh Patel. The fielding of the team was excellent. Some of the girls when batting really hit powerful sixes and the sheer confidence they exuded by just standing and watching the ball cross the fence was sublime. What was really heart warming was the crowd turnout as the match finished only around midnight. The DY Patil stadium with a capacity of over 45,000 was packed to the gills and the support our women in blue got was unbelievable. I don’t think the girls expected a full house crowd cheering them and this response should mo...
1 comment
Read more