Skip to main content

Why we are where we are Part 1


The Economic Times on 28th August 2013 ran a editorial where it asked a question on why we are where we are. This is my response to that editorial as invited by  ET. Part 2 is my further thoughts on the issue and will follow.

Mistakes occur either due to insufficient information,  risk taking,  bad judgement or  due to extraneous reasons beyond our control. Except in the last case every government has the option of making midcourse corrections.  This is exactly where this government has failed miserably  due to arrogance and blind ego apart from lacking in statesmanship. Let us list some correctable goof ups.

UPA was a coalition govt and it was crucial to have a single driver lead it no matter who the driver reported  to. Instead by having a dual power centre between Sonia and Manmohan disaster was guaranteed from day 1. Manmohan was a brilliant economist & bureaucrat but a cipher as a politician. A lamb living amidst lions for decades does not become a lion. Consequently the Congressmen chose to listen to Sonia while the coalition partners went to Pawar, Karunanidhi, Mamta. The result was that there was zero cohesion in decision making, policy framing or even problem solving. The PMO was just a waste bin where the problems landed up finally with no solution possible. For this or whatever reason Manmohan Singh went quiet and stays silent till today.  A large number of scams and issues have their  genesis in this lack of control & direction and once the chains had been removed it has been impossible to bring them back on.

Technology, Global events & Human behaviour  can never be predicted and so events happen that need changes in laws, justice & administration systems &  future strategies. These changes invariably happen AFTER the event. The changes based on learning’s  are a ongoing exercise and  there is no shame in this change.  Global mergers/acquisitions, Ecommerce, Social media,  Arab spring, Sri Lankan war and many such events posed challenges to our existing systems. Instead of responding maturely this govt chose to confront them as if they were a blasphemy. Case in point the Vodafone case where the event was perfectly legal and even the SC ruled against the Govt.  Instead of finding a out of the box, mediated solution  with Vodafone & bringing in fresh legislation the govt instead brought in retrospective change from 1960. This one action did more to damage India’s credibility as a nation more than anything else.

Foreign policy historically has always been sacred and the domain of the central govt which was expected to be above narrow  considerations. Instead we had the mortification of a PM being prevented from  signing  an accord with Bangladesh (which had helped combat terrorism against India), opposing Sri Lanka internationally and in each case a regional  party with a few MP’s decided foreign policy. Consequently the image of India as a banana republic with no driver or leader got reinforced globally and investors became wary of India. While many in public will make the right noises this  writer on his visits globally has found that the reputation of India has nosedived notwithstanding its huge market.

Administrative practices haven’t changed over the years inspite of the economy having changed beyond imagination. The centres of power for decision making remain as it were way back in the 90’s. Consequently a  Jt Secy who handled million dollar decisions now handles billion dollar decisions and the million dollar decisions don’t get focussed attention. It’s natural for any human/ system  to chase the big fish but in the process the dozens of small fish get neglected and  this bad news spreads and affects investment.

The NDA  govt had introduced  market based pricing for fuel,  done the dirty work and lost the election.  This govt changed that policy and the consequent impact due to steeply increasing fuel prices affected the country badly.  This govt is now going back to the old sensible decision of 2004 but 10 years late and after severe haemorrhaging.

Every decision taken has been with good intention, bad planning and poor execution. Consequently whether it is FDI in retail, Insurance reforms or any other policy including the FSB,  decisions have been forced as a fait accompli inspite of their good intent by failing to engage  maturely  with the stakeholders in discussion. The internal lack of leadership & direction has been blamed on the opposition who as is their nature see no reason to bail a govt that is tying itself in knots.

Each of these and  many others were easily correctable problems but for reasons best known to govt they never made an effort to even accept them as problems. Therein lies the rub in our disaster today.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Narendra Modi - Evolution of a Leader

  This is NOT about Narendra Modi, even though he is the central character. This is about the evolution of a leader particularly in the BJP and in the NDA/ India in general. Post the electoral defeat in 2009 the BJP was rudderless, notwithstanding the presence of LK Advani. He was old, tired, defeated and BJP could not find a pan India leader to lead the party in the Lok Sabha elections of 2014. They had leaders like Gadkari, Rajnath, Jaitley, Sushma, and however popular none could qualify as an all-India election campaign leader. Popular opinion was it would be a hung parliament. The nation was in a mess, and nobody wanted to clean it given that voter expectations were high, trust low. Kejriwal/ Hazare had mortally wounded the Indian political system. BJP at that point needed a fall guy.  Someone to do the hard work, and if they failed to win, take the blame. If they won, there would be many aspirants to stake a claim to be PM. Parties, barring for those family owned, rarely announced
4 comments
Read more

The INDI Alliance has indeed won !!!!

Quite a long time back when I first got the opportunity to sit in a company board meeting, I noticed the Chairman making a strange remark as he opened the board meeting. He used to say something like – “Please unhide your hidden agendas and keep your vested interests outside”. Young, intrigued I finally summoned enough courage to understand this from some other seniors and got a lesson I have never forgotten. He said that be it a person or an organisation, in many a situation, they have a stated intent and a real intent. Meaning that when they approach a situation, they explain what is their intent which would be more popular, acceptable and palatable to the audience but the real intent could well be very different. Most likely the real intent would be self-defeating or unpopular. In this just concluded election for the Lok Sabha we saw this happening in full flow and to my mind the BJP likely missed reading the message. It is not as if I have some inside information but am using log
Post a Comment
Read more

Questions - Answers anyone ?

Life & weight, certainly changes with time. This is both enduring & educative. A picture they say speaks a million words. The allegation is that in the last 10 years only opposition leaders have been arrested by the Modi govt and these are only political vendetta and nothing more. Let’s not argue that point and grant it as true. That does not mean there are no questions that cannot be asked. The problem is nobody has dared to raise these questions and if one raises them, bingo, the allegation is that one is supporting the Modi govt, blinded being a bhakth and unable to see reality etc. The message is – don’t anybody dare ask questions. Only the old eco-system has the wisdom and freedom to ask questions. Those who ask any question that is inconvenient to the old eco-system you become an apologist for the evil, fascist, dictatorial kind of adjectives. But questions must be asked. They will be asked. If folks don’t have the courage to answer and prefer to be belligerent, then so b
3 comments
Read more