Skip to main content

Random Musings - February 2026


I last wrote a blog in November 25 and though globally, politically lots of stuff happened, personally, professionally I just could not sit down to pen my thoughts. Finally, I pushed myself today to write.

Trade Deals:

After a landmark trade deal with UK in mid-2025, India signed one with European Union in January’26 and in February’26, Donald Trump as usual unilaterally announced that a trade deal was agreed which India did not contradict and instead followed up with confirmations. Even if the USA trade deal were to be inked, the deal has no sanctity given the whimsical negotiating strategy of POTUS. The global political order has changed, and Trump is rewriting every single rule there is in life.

The risk in this is that if some other global leader inspired or frustrated decides to react equally whimsically, this new normal can get formalised and change the world forever. If on the other hand, the rest hold their horses/ tongue, we can see a calibrated return to status quo ante in the rest of the world. USA will take a long time to recover from the body blows – because Trump has single handedly catalysed exactly what he sought to prevent – dollar (de)dominance.

This activity world over where the dollar is actively kept out will continue and unless USA scales back on its whimsical politics it will only gather pace and a truly multilateral world with multiple currencies will become dominant.


Where and how the Indian currency will get positioned – is a moot question and right now there are no clear answers. In the short run however, the Chinese Yuan can get prominence but to think China is a stabilising world power is a pipe dream. It is a hegemonic world power.

If the USA is blessed with a huge distance between it and others and decent neighbours, India has no such luxury and sandwiched between multiple “enemies”.

2026/27 should be an interesting year – to put it mildly.

Indian Industry - Lazy?:

Having spent a lifetime in the manufacturing sector across various industry segments I have often said what is disliked by many – Indian Industry is LAZY!!!!

Before one gets their hackles up, I am not using Lazy in its classical definition since we work very hard, we put up motivational posters across our factories and offices, even CEO’s boast of 18 hr days etc. I use the term in a totally different context. Do read this post on LinkedIn and this interview in a newspapers. Again, this is not about Bajaj auto but Indian industry in general.

India's Start Up Eco Systems

China supplies over 90% of the magnets globally, said to control 69% of the production. I had written about how the Dragon wins in business in 2020.

Why the Chinese Dragon wins in Business

Bajaj Auto and I am sure many other automakers, others are equally affected by the shortage of these rare earth magnets which they import from China. As per reports, 69% of the global production and 90% of the supplies to the world are controlled by China. Did this happen in the last 24 hrs ? No, this was growing steadily and swiftly and with each increase in scale, volume, control, the Chinese gave discounts and typical of Indian industry they were in a perpetual wet dreams mode. Not one CEO am sure has ever asked his supply chain team – what is your derisking strategy – when you depend 100% on one country. They were I am sure dreaming of the fat bonuses, dividends, villas in Dubai and London by buying more from China. To be fair even the rest of the world did the same mistake but the western world was closely involved while the Indian private sector turned into traders.

My question - what clarity is this industry leader seeking from the Govt ? Does he think India still follows the pre 1991 system where everybody needed to go to the DGFT before taking any decision? Did any India Govt post 1991 prevent such folks from derisking their business/ supply chains ? At best one can argue that the Indian Govt has not pursued a policy of promoting the rare earth/ mining industry in India - but to demand clarity as here betrays the REAL thinking - "we will import ONLY from China, and unless we have clarity from the Govt we will be hurt".

25 years back I recall attending a board meeting and proudly presenting about how we had developed a major customer/ revenues, the Chairman commented that at around 50%+ I was creating a huge risk for the company and instead of celebrating, I should be presenting to the board my derisking strategy to bring this customer's share to less than 30%. Big lesson learnt by me but not by the Indian or even global industry it seems.

Way back in the 90’s when India liberalised, the same Bajaj group was against that decision but 34 years later, reports indicate that upto 40% and even 70% of an EV scooter is based on imported components with majority parts from China. Has even one Indian manufacturer worked on a second/ third vendor development plan on hand. Willing to bet - slim and none.

As a part of the manufacturing industry in a customer facing role, I do not recall even one offering a level playing field to Indian vendors as compared to the Chinese. But wait, wasn’t that exactly the argument of the infamous Bombay club led by Rahul Bajaj where he rightly argued that Indian industry must be given a level playing field compared to the foreigners ?

Today, a Chinese manufacturer will demand numbers, commitments, and offer a low price and the Indian buyer accepts those without a murmur. An Indian vendor for the same item, is rarely if ever given the same terms and yet the buyers demand the same Chinese price. I don’t just blame the buyer, I equally blame the vendors who will not think big, execute big and when faced with a commercial challenge will take the first flight to Shanghai and before one can blink, will transform into traders. I don’t blame them either, for centuries, Indian reputation and DNA is that of traders.

That the Finance Minister of India - after having been in that role for 9 years - signalling continuity in thought process and in a government that is in power for 12 years, signalling continuity in policy - has to make such statement is a slap on the face of the Indian Private sector.

I can rationalise that 2014 ~ 2019 the private sector was unsure if this new Govt was a black swan event, then in 2019 ~ 2024, the pandemic hit. But At least by 2021/22 the Indian private sector should have started investing and they failed to do so.

But the world is changing. The trade deals referred above create opportunities for Indian manufacturing to spread its wings globally, to a plan. The big question is – will they or once again in a lazy manner surrender to the Chinese from Vietnam, Thailand instead. The Prime Minister was on target when he mentioned that reforms in India were always in a duress situation. Indian industry needs to wake up and change failing which AI and other technology will drown the nation into becoming yet again a colonised nation like in the past.

Indian Infotech/ service industry:

This recent post on X caught my attention and while my reaction is NOT about Infosys, it is about my tirade on the laziness of the Indian industry.



7 Indian software/infotech companies with a global footprint have a total of around 60 Billion $ in reserves as per public reports.

We have heard of Global brands/products that we identify with daily – Microsoft, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google, Amazon, Apple etc and each are aspirational for Indians.

Till 2026 I do not recall a single global Product/ Brand created/acquired by an Indian company that is used globally. Each of the above products/brands have significant Indian infotech talent creating and building them, even leading them – but not one has ever been inspired to create something or even acquire something. 

Flipkart one would have thought as an Indian competitor to Amazon could have gone global, the Indian infotech giants could have given them wings to fly high, but instead they stumbled and were acquired by Walmart, USA for just 16 Billion. Today the top of the mind recall even in India is Amazon, not Flipkart even though Flipkart can claim a higher marketshare. Walmart has invested to increase stake but very little in business as compared to Amazon.

In a changing world where each one of us is constantly online, our lives merged online to a terrifying degree, cybersecurity is key and is anyone in India working to create a solution for the world or get acclaimed as the Cybersecurity experts? Nyah. Heck I am unsure if the Indian infotech industry even has folks who can hack into global systems as a part of Indian Defence Deterrance, while China, Pakistan, North Korea and others seem able to hack into global systems and wreak havoc on economies.

Wars are changing at a fast pace and drones that cost a few hundred dollars can bring down a nation economically or optionally create deterrence that can protect its cities and citizens. These involve a combination of hardware/software and cutting edge technology – again is this activity getting prominence within the Infotech industry in India to go global? Nyah. Drones are for Pre wedding and wedding shoots !!

Folks will argue of how something was done in India, but my argument is not about doing something in India, it is about doing something for the world, from India. That is when we truly become global and find a seat at the high table. Not as the colonised hangers on being given scraps from the table and feeling proud but being the host at the table. That is when we would have truly arrived.

Comments

RAJESH KUMATHEKAR said…
Wonderful. Nicely, thoughtfully written. Insightful & very helpful for Strategic planning purpose.
Anonymous said…
Point about being lazy Indian manufacturing industry is debatable. Agree that for years, cheap and readily available imports from China made domestic investment in costly infrastructure less attractive. But mining of monazite, the main source of rare earth elements in India, was long restricted to government agencies due to its thorium content, which is classified as an atomic mineral. This created a state monopoly (IREL a mini-ratna), limiting innovation and production capacity. However, India lacks the sophisticated, specialized, and often proprietary technology required to separate and refine rare earth elements and manufacture high-performance magnets. This called for high long-term capital investment with uncertain returns. While India has raw material resources, it failed to develop the intermediate processing, metallurgical, and, chemical engineering capacity, creating a gap in the supply chain. Key initiatives include a ₹7,280 crore incentive scheme (Nov 2025) and dedicated "Rare Earth Corridors" in four states, announced in the 2026–27 Budget to boost domestic production, mining, and research. When China tightened exports during a trade dispute, hitting Indian and global carmakers and electronics firms, the EV industry was forced for alternatives. India is not alone in scrambling for alternatives. The EU, Australia and others have launched similar efforts to loosen China's grip. The National Critical Mineral Mission has been established to maintain stockpiles and keep its supply chain resilient. Chinese magnets are cheap and, unless Indian-made alternatives are competitively priced, imports could continue to dominate. Hope for the best in future with no major political interference.
Anonymous said…
The Indian IT industry historically focused on a service-based model (outsourcing, maintenance) rather than product innovation, prioritizing low-risk, steady revenue over high-risk, long-term investments needed for global software products. This approach was driven by a lack of early domestic market demand, a culture of execution rather than invention, and significant brain drain.
Product development, like Google or Microsoft, requires massive, patient capital and a tolerance for failure, which is scarce in the Indian ecosystem – in short risk averse Indian IT industry, focusing on shareholder returns than investment in product R&D.
Vishal Sikka represented a rare, forward-looking visionary in the Indian IT sector, specifically regarding early artificial intelligence adoption, which often clashed with the industry's traditional, service-oriented, and cautious growth mindset. At a time when there was no ChatGPT, Gemini, or self-driving cars, Vishal Sikka gave a presentation on AI before NITI Aayog at the PM’s request, where officials of 20 Union Ministries were gathered. Nobody in India understood in 2019 what Sikka was saying. He is back in 2026 and many are listening to him. Sikka’s Advice to IT Services Companies: You have to shift the delivery model from labour arbitrage to “Labour + AI” arbitrage. It means, the AI component (AI platform, LLM models, AI applications) must be your own proprietary technology, and not rented from others.
Having said this, Nandan Nilekani is a foundational thinker in digital public infrastructure who, unlike traditional IT managers, designed massive technological platforms, thanks to Aadhaar and Open Network for Digital Commerce. FC Kohli championed early investment in computing hardware to drive India's IT revolution, in the mid-1990s, but his word was not heard much in North block. After nearly 3 decades, India is waking up to setting up semi-conductor chip factories. Better late than never.
India has 18% of the world’s population. We have to build our own foundation models, our own large-scale AI systems, and our own world-class applications on top of them. “Skill Gap” is a Loser’s Excuse: Out of 8 billion people in the world, only about 1.5 million are able to build AI applications. The number of people who can deploy AI in production is just a few hundred thousand.
Anonymous said…
Indian IT industries often prioritize "product or service delivery" over fundamental technology development, leading to strong operational skills but weaker innovation. This is probably due to higher investment needed for design of products, where only a fingerful succeed. Of late, there are companies like Zoho beginning to enter this space, but still some time for the IT sector to come up like what China has done. Feel, some government policies can help de-colonize foreign products from Indian companies. In sectors like construction, site execution is often preferred for higher profits and immediate, tangible results compared to design. India's strength currently lies in scaling and implementing, while investment in high-level design, R&D, and product innovation is still maturing. Look at how UPI scaled now, compared what it was 10 years ago at launch time. Countries are trying to emulate our scale. The Amul AI “Sarlaben” suggested in mid Jan was operational by mid Feb. It draws from an extensive knowledge network and a database of over 3 crore cattle to deliver accurate responses to farmer queries in Gujarati. The AI model can also be replicated in every language of India and the world. Using data from tagged cattle registered in the system, Amul AI quickly answers on cattle profiles, feed and fodder management, health and symptom evaluation, milk yield drops, lactation support and more.
Vasisht said…
Zoho - recently started what they think is a competition to WhatsApp called Arattai. A tamil word for chat. After a few days of frenzied activity, nobody even uses it anymore. Try saying the name of the app in USA, France or Brazil and you will know what we do in reality. There was this compeition to Twitter called Koo. The support it got was humungous, but the chaps could not even rectify simple issues and using it was such a frustrating experience. The problem is not that we cannot do something, it is our attitude, a chalta hain, adjust karo, etc approach and a total inability to think big, think global. No it does not cost money, till you actually go global. But you must think global - like China came up with WeChat and we call it Arattai !! This thought process doesnt cost money
Vasisht said…
Understandable views but as a "vendor" in the manufacturing sector over decades, a indian customer will want chinese pricing but not agree for the volumes, the commitments, the quality, the delivery......the indian vendor equally has no incentive to take risk with such customers. OEM Customers who will get a price X from China by committing to say 100,000 nos, will demand the same price X from a Indian vendor, but end up committing 10,000 nos. I spent 9 months with a Chinese bus manufacturer OEM who refused to use a small sub-component of a bus that was not made in China even when the overseas customer demanded it while buying a large number of buses. A indian bus OEM would NOT have spent even 9 seconds debating this and would have agreed to buy a non Indian sub component when selling his bus to a foreign customer. THAT is the difference between us and China

Popular posts from this blog

Humour in Real Life Part 1

Life has been good to me, have spent significant time travelling, faced various situations and when one looks back, many were rather funny but usually in hindsight. These can lose their sting when written, but I still try. They are not in any order. Gujarat Hotel: Joined a new company and many of us at a senior level were new to the company and each other. Met up in our hotel room on the eve of a meeting in Gujarat – a dry state. Invariably the conversation came to getting alcohol and none knew what to do. One guy had a bright idea and picking up the phone ordered in a friendly but all-knowing voice – Ask Pinto to send it to the room. Obviously, there was some confusion at the other end, but my colleague confidently said – don’t worry yaar, Pinto knows everything, just tell him. Line disconnected and we ask – who’s this Pinto? He says – I don’t know but usually every hotel will have a guy named Pinto !!!!!!. Now Gujarat can have lakhs of Patel’s but not Pinto, a very Goan name bu...

Humour in Real Life - Part 2

Odessa file: In college, a totally bald professor had a class scheduled in the afternoon when we got news that he was sick, and the class cancelled. Me and my friend - incidentally both of us had shoulder length hair – decided to go watch the matinee show of the film “The Odessa File”. We reached the theatre to find ahead of us in the line – who else but the bald professor. Like typical college kids we generally discussed him in colourful words and avoiding him got into the theatre and soon interval time arrived. Most folks left the seats to step out while we continued sitting. My friend in a loud voice with very colourful words recalled the Professor bunking class to see a movie and soon asked in general. “Where the f**k is that baldy I say” and we turned around – only to find the Professor sitting exactly behind us and stared into each other’s eyes. We quickly turned back and I don’t think we even saw the rest of the film properly. Even as the credit list came on, we literally ...

Winds of Political Change

  However well meaning, when a political system pushes an agenda that threatens to upend all logic, human life and society as we know it and above all demonstrates a hypocrisy that even a deaf mute blind can see and hear, people will react strongly. Even if logic dictates that economics, development, progress should be the cornerstones of human priorities, the same humans will “disregard” these because the threat they see, is seen as a threat to economics, development and progress. The major mistakes made by the Democrats, liberals, and otherwise derisively termed “wokes” were the following, even if they claim that they are saving the world. Within a short time after the Covid pandemic started, the larger public were convinced the pandemic was engineered, covid vaccines useless if not dangerous and the pharma industry in cahoots with corrupt politicians was playing god. Gender affirmation and choice activism coming close on the heels of the pandemic only reaffirmed the larger view ...